Beautiful Feet

Too many big words...

Hey Rick. If you do get a chance to post, and if it's not cumbersome, would you give us a sense of the conference? Do they plan on having a panel with Wright and Gaffin and taking questions from the audience? Does it seem like there's a wide range of people there - not just the RTS crew (Duncan, Kelly) or the Morecraft crew, but also other pastors from the PCA? I'd heard this was going to be a popular conference drawing from all over the ideological map from the denomination, and am hoping it'll stir up some good dialogue.

What in Wilson's post was it that frustrated you?

Mike: He doesn't seem to know what the heck he's talking about.

Scott: If someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll give a report in a couple of days.

I think there is more here than meets the eye. If I'm correct, then in a way it is too bad that the Wilson-Sandlin exchange is taking place in public, because there are things that require one to have "inside" information in order to be able to read between the lines. I suggest not losing sleep over it.

Good Mr. Sandlin isn't exactly a philosophy buff himself. His second essay seemed to read pomoism as, simply, not being overly confident about one's theology. Seemed a bit trite and all. Imho, at least.

Like I said, I haven't read Sandlin's argument, so I don't know that he can really beat Wilson's argument. All I'm saying is Wilson hasn't really understood pomo-ism.

Scott,
they just lectured and asked each other questions and took questions from the audience in the Q and A. I thought the Q and A was the best part of the conference. Their asking each other questions seemed to clarify a lot.

Also, there were people of all types. Liberal and conservative baptists, Anglicans, Lutherans, and all sorts of Reformed.